"The Robing Room: WI State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Mary Triggiano

Comments

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: WI197
Rating:1.0

Comments:
How does it feel to allow Danny Billings walk the streets when you had a chance to put him away?? That worked out great. Sleep well.

Other

Comment #: WI127
Rating:1.0

Comments:
You can clearly see in judge Triggiano's in-court decisions that she is an avid womens rights activist. I personally sat through a few of her court cases where it was evident, & I am sure that if her cases were to be reviewed that alot if not most would be overturned for the clear bias shown torwards women even against her own case law. I recently had the misfortune of having a case decided by judge M. Triggiano. In my particular case judge Triggiano took the plantiff (who had already given multiple false statements to the court & the police{3 different stories}) aside, & decided to keep a no contact order in place, while on the record in the court room it was decided that the state could not (with so many lies already told) charge me & the case was dismissed. But, my public defender told me outside the courtroom (after the fact) that I could still have no contact with the plantiff, which happens to be the mother of my child, which essentially makes seeing my child an impossibility. It is clear to me that in judge Triggiano's courtroom she makes the law with no regard to how the law is supposed to work.