The Robing Room

Hon. Mark E. WindhamJudgeSuperior CourtLos Angeles

1.0

Comment #	Occupation	Rating	Comments	Date & Time	Actions
133894	Criminal Defense Lawyer	View Details	Had him in a criminal trial. Clearly the worst judge that I have ever tried a case before. I am glad to see that he is on the civil bench, as he can do less damage there. Please don't look at the fact that he was an ex Public Defe...Read More	08/29/2025 11:17 PM	Contact reviewer
129848	Litigant	No Rating	Third class Judge Mark E Windham, Department 26, his brain is not working. Falsely declared my friend "Sushant Gupta" a Vexatious litigant, made him suicidal, he has left work, and is taking depression medication because of this...Read More	11/27/2024 05:07 PM	Contact reviewer
127027	Court Staff	No Rating	Horrid judge and also an attention-seeking missile. He loved the camera during the Durst trial not unlike Ito/OJ. It's unfortunate and disgraceful how he seems unable to manage his courtroom and allows multiple people to speak at ...Read More	05/27/2024 10:40 AM	Contact reviewer
125848	Litigant	No Rating	I will say that he has improved in the way of his temperament by what I can tell from each of your responses. Even though he still displays the erroneous behavior and has little respect for the true argument of your specific case....Read More	03/14/2024 09:39 AM	Contact reviewer
124198	Litigant	No Rating	Very unethical and horrible demeanor. He appears to be more aligned with a predetermined outcome than doing the work of understanding a case and the law. Do not allow this guy to hear your case he is there for one purpose and th...Read More	12/21/2023 08:51 PM	Contact reviewer
122999	Civil Litigation - Private	View Details	I’ve only appeared before this judge in one case but I found his behavior on the bench appalling.	10/24/2023 12:32 AM	Contact reviewer
101783	Litigant	No Rating	"Judge" is not worthy of the title. He ran unopposed & that's the only reason he is a judge. Watch his behavior in the Durst case for example. Absolutely arrogant & disgraceful! No fair judge would permit even 1/2 of the prosecuto...Read More	12/25/2021 07:09 PM	Contact reviewer
100899	Civil Litigation - Private	No Rating	Shockingly unqualified to be sitting pro tem in Division Three of the Court of Appeal thru December 10, 2021. He shamelessly distorts the facts and the law. I feel sorry for those whose lives/interests are placed before him. He is...Read More	11/26/2021 08:03 PM	Contact reviewer
53576	Criminal Defense Lawyer	No Rating	This is the judge from hell. He is bias and prejudice and will manipulate the trial including excusing jurors for race, not allowing defence to present experts and allowing late discovery. You should try ti take deal if you get th...Read More	01/16/2018 10:12 PM	Contact reviewer
46862	Criminal Defense Lawyer	View Details	Not smart; very rude; very biased in favor of prosecution and against defense; highly unqualified to be a judicial officer; publicity-hungry.	12/22/2016 02:21 PM	Contact reviewer
46414	Criminal Defense Lawyer	View Details	HUGE BULLY ! ARROGANT IMMATURE SELF-AGGRANDIZING INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST MEDIA MOTIVATED	11/22/2016 05:27 PM	Contact reviewer