The Robing Room

Hon. Andrew E. SweetJudgeSuperior CourtMarin

1.6

Comment #	Occupation	Rating	Comments	Date & Time	Actions
132675	Criminal Defense Lawyer	View Details	This judge is completely clueless about fairness and impartiality. He simply picks a side and blindly copies whatever they write in their briefs. repeats false assertions and ignores the rule of law. Avoid this court at all costs.	05/08/2025 04:34 PM	Contact reviewer
132365	Civil Litigation - Private	View Details	I completely agree with prior comments. His bias and lack of impartiality is best demonstrated by always favoring one side and ignoring the other. Judicial integrity appears to be absent in this judge’s courtroom. According to Cal...Read More	04/22/2025 12:19 PM	Contact reviewer
131521	Civil Litigation - Private	View Details	Judge Sweet consistently demonstrates a lack of impartiality and fairness in his decision-making. His actions often suggest a predisposition towards one side, undermining his objectivity. Furthermore, there appears to be a troubli...Read More	03/18/2025 04:45 PM	Contact reviewer
128181	Criminal Defense Lawyer	No Rating	Update: At an IC, the Judge is thoughtful and almost deferential. In general, does not like making decisions which could be appealed. Has trouble saying yes or no. Forgets what he said at the last conference, and gets prickly if y...Read More	08/12/2024 05:27 PM	Contact reviewer
128180	Criminal Defense Lawyer	No Rating	Update: At an IC, the Judge is thoughtful and almost deferential. In general, does not like making decisions which could be appealed. Has trouble saying yes or no. Forgets what he said at the last conference, and gets prickly if y...Read More	08/12/2024 05:27 PM	Contact reviewer
125312	Civil Litigation - Private	View Details	I think the judge makes an effort to be good. He gets stymied at thehearing by tangential issues. Can get prickly. Has forgotten the importance of letting everyone have their say. Smarter than most lawyers, which is not saying muc...Read More	02/21/2024 04:09 PM	Contact reviewer
119419	Civil Litigation - Private	View Details	Judge Andrew Sweet is extremely unfair after he picks a side. He is lazy and does not read the papers. He is not in any way impartial nor is he courteous. He is a phony and he lacks the experience of civil law and it shows He...Read More	07/13/2023 05:30 PM	Contact reviewer
118189	Civil Litigation - Private	View Details	`Sweet does not have the intellectual capacity or the temperament to be on the bench. He doesn’t understand black letter law.	05/19/2023 01:28 PM	Contact reviewer
118160	Civil Litigation - Private	View Details	He has no business being a Judge. He has no temperament for the bench. His ego is too big, he is unable or unwilling to apply the law unless it fits with his preconceived notion of what should happen. He is unwilling or (more like...Read More	05/18/2023 03:22 PM	Contact reviewer
117854	Civil Litigation - Private	View Details	Does not have intellectual or the temperament to be a judge. This is what happens when political connections gets you the job,	05/06/2023 02:26 AM	Contact reviewer
114320	Civil Litigation - Private	View Details	Biased against women lawyers.	12/30/2022 05:59 PM	Contact reviewer
113562	Litigant	No Rating	I found Judge Sweet rather pompous and arrogant, especially considering his 4.1 rating on this website. I did find him very generous with my property, allowing my serial squatter tenant another twenty days of free rent and utilit...Read More	12/10/2022 12:41 PM	Contact reviewer
105479	Court Staff	No Rating	Appreciating the time and effort you put into your blog and in depth information you offer. It's great to come across a blog every once in a while that isn't the same old rehashed material. Great read! I've bookmarked your site an...Read More	06/08/2022 07:03 PM	Contact reviewer