| Comment # | Occupation | Rating | Comments | Date & Time | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 123734 | Criminal Defense Lawyer | View Details | In the criminal realm, this judge is a second prosecutor. Ive practiced 20 years in Sacramento and this is one of two very bad judges, worth the 170.6 challenge if you have to rely on court discretion. Probably better for misdem...Read More | 11/17/2023 03:07 PM | Contact reviewer |
| 76563 | Litigant | No Rating | Ignores documents. Baised. Rude. Hides behind his gravel. Takes mediation recommendations as his owns. Does not follow orders. Makes untrue statements. Does make make orders in the best interest of children. | 09/23/2019 01:38 PM | Contact reviewer |
| 69453 | Criminal Defense Lawyer | View Details | Biased, prejudiced and possibly racist. He ignores documents amd prima facie facts of cases for people he doesnt like and will screw up everything and present a misrepresentation of the actual events of a trial in his ruling to pr...Read More | 05/25/2019 01:05 PM | Contact reviewer |
| 58377 | Litigant | No Rating | Openly biased against pro se parties. Rubber stamps FCS mediator recommendations. Makes findings in contradiction to documented facts in order to rule in favor of parties represented by temporary judges. | 08/02/2018 10:41 AM | Contact reviewer |
| 36039 | Litigant | No Rating | Bias and prejudice. Ignores Grand Jury findings of the crooked Citrus Heights Redlight camera system | 07/07/2015 09:58 PM | Contact reviewer |
© Copyright The Robing Room All Rights Reserved