Hon. David K ReinertJudgeSuperior CourtLos Angeles
2.0
| Comment # | Occupation | Rating | Comments | Date & Time | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 120063 | Litigant | No Rating | This Judge is nasty and rude he accepts bribes I reported him to Judicial board...If you know you know! | 08/18/2023 04:11 PM | Contact reviewer |
| 119115 | Civil Litigation - Private | View Details | This Judge disregarded the evidence completely in a small claims trial about the production of a operational mobile application for a dog grooming business. Both litigants put the design "prototype" between 25 and 33 1/3 % of the...Read More | 06/22/2023 05:53 AM | Contact reviewer |
| 119018 | Litigant | No Rating | I completely agree with the reviews from 6/6/2023, and 5/12/2022. Ignore the other reviews about how "sweet" and "nice", etc., that they are claiming Reinert is. As in the review from 6/6/2023..this is a person who has been foole...Read More | 06/16/2023 06:13 PM | Contact reviewer |
| 118747 | Civil Litigation - Private | View Details | This Judge is prejudice and bias. He favors attorney’s. He allows the attorneys to come in late, not be sworn in and rearranges the cases based on what attorneys are present and which attorney’s are running late. He disregards ...Read More | 06/06/2023 08:14 AM | Contact reviewer |
| 105298 | Litigant | No Rating | Great calm, kind, fair judge, very sweet and kind, also smart and fair. | 06/02/2022 06:23 PM | Contact reviewer |
| 105297 | Litigant | No Rating | Very kind. Very nice judge.???????? Brings the court experience in a while different level. | 06/02/2022 06:17 PM | Contact reviewer |
| 105296 | Litigant | No Rating | 10=The best judge. He is such a gentlemen, very polite, very very sweet guy, he is calm and kind. His kindness made me feel less nervous, he is very kind to all the parties, including all litigants and his staff, you can tell ever...Read More | 06/02/2022 06:12 PM | Contact reviewer |
| 104840 | Criminal Defense Lawyer | No Rating | This guy thinks that fraud is not a reason to overturn “default judgements” under CCP 473 (d) in certain circumstances, or at least he said the semantic equivalent on the record on the 15th of last month in 21IWUD00695 (leaving a ...Read More | 05/12/2022 11:36 AM | Contact reviewer |
© Copyright The Robing Room All Rights Reserved