Hon. Michael L. SternJudgeSuperior CourtLos Angeles
2.0
Comment # Occupation Rating CommentsDate & Time Actions
123125Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Lacks judicial temperament. Bizarre "findings" and language in statement of decision and judgment suggests possible onset of dementia.11/02/2023 08:57 AMContact reviewer
112012Criminal Defense Lawyer
View Details
Stern is lazy. He sucks up his paycheck but does not want to do the work. He is motivated by trying to dump cases, regardless of the law or facts. He often ignores binding precedent, and if he does not like you facts he sustain...Read More11/22/2022 07:09 PMContact reviewer
76274Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Real smart and the best education. He still has a moral compass, will not put up with bad lawyers or waste of his time. Better be prepared and defer to role as a decider of disputed matters. He will earn your respect.09/17/2019 06:10 PMContact reviewer
59046OtherNo RatingI worked with him for several years. He is an abusive , demeaning , horrible person. And as a judge? the taxpayers deserve a competent sane person in his place. He should be removed from the bench.08/25/2018 12:50 AMContact reviewer
55614Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
I can not even believe a judge like this exists. Utterly biased and prejudiced either against me and my client (two women) or in favor of opposing counsel and his client (two Latino males). I am not being paranoid but I cannot...Read More05/02/2018 07:35 PMContact reviewer
50646LitigantNo Ratingi will soon file in federal court charges of "extrinsic fraud" and "fraud upon the court" on this guy. a complete disgrace to justice, and his courtroom is clearly an abundance of racism. this guy is a minority himself, yet beli...Read More07/16/2017 11:33 PMContact reviewer
50005Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Should be removed from the bench. Assaultive, rude, arrogant, and fully hates women and minorities and doesn't seem to care who knows it. Treats female attorneys like misbehaving children, even when legally they are correct. Ignor...Read More06/07/2017 06:56 PMContact reviewer
45688Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
the worst damn judge at the trial level. if you go up against a public entity, this fool will side with the entity all the way. talks about his Stanford law degree 10X a day, but this guy can't even add and lacks mathematical re...Read More10/04/2016 12:30 PMContact reviewer
44454Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
I am a veteran of over thirty jury trials and truly admire the dedication and skill of this great judge. Armed with a wry wit and the ability to teach with the humorous invective, which can be misinterpreted, Judge Stern not only...Read More07/26/2016 05:38 PMContact reviewer
44263Criminal Defense Lawyer
View Details
Awful judge. Don't be surprised if you find out he has not read your motion or opposition. Thinks highly of himself and belittles others. Does not know the law even when you present it on a silver plate. Makes weird rulings. ...Read More07/14/2016 01:58 AMContact reviewer
37909Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
I have tried four cases before him. Each and every time he is a stickler for the rules, and does not suffer fools. He is not afraid to make a ruling, and he is exceptional when it comes to moving the case. He does not waste tim...Read More10/05/2015 07:43 PMContact reviewer
33521Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
pro defendant, conversative, pompous a--, dry humor, demeaning to lawyers, especially to women and minorities.03/19/2015 02:44 AMContact reviewer
32750Criminal Defense LawyerNo Ratinghad a trial, eliminated all of my exhibits, did not use a my verdict form, but used the opponents, is funny and likeable, but has this rude woman as his clerk, going against a public entity, a lot of political bullshit in favor o...Read More02/03/2015 09:35 PMContact reviewer
32566Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Does not listen even when he is clearly wrong on the law. He believes he is always right even when case law is cited that provides that he is wrong. Does not even allow you to be heard.01/26/2015 11:22 AMContact reviewer
30873Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
He has to be the smartest person in the room and will not follow the law. Despite what the law says, he follows "Stern's law". This is a problem. People need to get out and vote and use more discretion at the polls in which judges...Read More11/08/2014 06:10 AMContact reviewer
29379OtherNo RatingSubtracting completely the ex election fraud presdient of 2000 2004 USA from Judge Michael Stern in department 62 Los Angeles, Ca. closing.doc by 88 Ronald L. Vaught, Superior court September 2014.09/10/2014 05:03 PMContact reviewer
28485Criminal Defense LawyerNo RatingSubstantial comments are consistent in revealing that this judge "Fails to Follow" the "Courtroom Rules." Such "Consistent Statements" being made significantly raise a question to the violation of "Due Process" from the other sid...Read More07/30/2014 11:46 PMContact reviewer
28484Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Substantial comments are consistent in revealing that this judge "Fails to Follow" the "Courtroom Rules." Such "Consistent Statements" being made significantly raise a question to the violation of "Due Process" from the other sid...Read More07/30/2014 11:45 PMContact reviewer
28481Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Substantial comments are consistent in revealing that this judge "Fails to Follow" the "Courtroom Rules." Such "Consistent Statements" being made significantly raise a question to the violation of "Due Process" from the other sid...Read More07/30/2014 11:44 PMContact reviewer
28479Civil Litigation - Govt.
View Details
"Extremely easy to falsify evidence and fabricate statements" while the plaintiffs may present extraordinary evidence. The commissioner will NOT consider the evidence, let alone glance at it, while the respondents will have "No E...Read More07/30/2014 11:42 PMContact reviewer
25319Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
He is an excellent judge. In all his years on the bench, he has been known as the judge who never enforces the rules if he likes you. Judge Stern is the best -- all bark, and a toothless bite!02/21/2014 05:13 PMContact reviewer
21078Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Stern has a great sense of humor, but requires counsel to follow the rules.04/17/2013 01:39 PMContact reviewer
19675Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Really one of the rudest judgest I've come across. Loves talking down to attorney's. I tried a civil case in his courtroom and he loves making attorneys feel stupid, which to his credit he does evenly to both parties. but i got...Read More01/21/2013 04:28 PMContact reviewer
18394Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Can't stand judges like this. Pompous and won't admit to being wrong. I was working on a case that was removed to federal court from Judge Stern's docket, and he set an OSC re sanctions for failure to show up to a "post removal ...Read More11/04/2012 06:59 PMContact reviewer
17900Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Judge Stern is the worst. I tried a bench case to him. Plaintiff attorney didn't answer discovery, he refused to award sanctions, saying it was a cost of doing business. Plaintiff attorney missed the FSC, he continued the trial....Read More10/09/2012 06:50 PMContact reviewer
15473Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Avoid this judge at all costs, if you represent the defense. He provides very vague and ambiguous basis for his rulings. Even if you point out the opposition has NO EVIDENCE to support a proposition, he refuses to change his rul...Read More06/15/2012 01:31 PMContact reviewer
14759Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
While he is a smart judge he is pedantic to the point that he is totally infelixable. He will not rule on motions in limine if the declaration does not comply in every respect with the rule. He is unfriendly, terse, and unapproa...Read More04/30/2012 04:24 PMContact reviewer
14599Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Absolutely awful; rude; dismissive; erroneous rulings; misses the point; started to think he was being paid off by the other side.04/20/2012 11:07 AMContact reviewer
14131Criminal Defense Lawyer
View Details
I tried a civil personal injury case before Judge Stern. He is difficult, at best. He is a smart guy but made an obviously wrong ruling in my favor which I advised him was wrong. He said that the plaintiff could appeal.03/20/2012 05:18 PMContact reviewer
11667Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
I had a suit against the city. I don't know what happened, but Stern did not want to touch this case. My thoughts are that politics were more important to him than the actual law.08/28/2011 06:30 PMContact reviewer
6153Criminal Defense Lawyer
View Details
I tried a bench trial before this judge. He sat expressionless throughout the trial, stared blankly into space, and did not take a single note. Then, when the decided the case, it was like he was deciding a different case than w...Read More09/22/2009 05:29 PMContact reviewer
6146Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
One of the best, if not the best, trial judges I have been in front of. While many Judges like to pretend they know the rules of evidence and your case then you do, Judge Stern actually does. In my experience, he is not biased a...Read More09/21/2009 03:59 AMContact reviewer
4663Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
He tried many cases as a lawyer and conducts a lot of trials in his department too. He's fair and knows the law better than most judges and attorneys out there. He's not afraid to let you know it too.02/06/2009 06:38 PMContact reviewer

© Copyright The Robing Room All Rights Reserved