Hon. John C. GastelumJudgeSuperior CourtOrange
2.4
Comment # Occupation Rating CommentsDate & Time Actions
126358LitigantNo RatingSustained a demurrer against my complaint which laid out a valid cause of action. The case is now in the Court of Appeal04/18/2024 04:14 PMContact reviewer
116925LitigantNo RatingOne of the comments states that the wife is a well respected atty. in Orange County. LOL. Apparently she has hidden her past real good. Quite a scary and sadistic person. Judge must be a prisoner of the marriage. Seems like a dece...Read More03/23/2023 12:35 PMContact reviewer
114435Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Very poor quality judge. Slow to rule on motions. Many decisions appear only to have been written by overworked and poorly educated research attorneys on court staff.01/04/2023 06:37 PMContact reviewer
109871Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
I would 170.6 this judge immediately. He bends the law to suit his decisions. I've read many of his rulings and its clear he either has no grasp of the law, is lazy, or extremely biased. Unfortunately, I don't think Orange County ...Read More08/28/2022 12:47 AMContact reviewer
74552Criminal Defense LawyerNo RatingI don't blame this judge for looking at cute lady lawyers. His wife resembles a Mrs. Potato Head. Give the fellow a break. he is only human although not a brainy type at all.08/18/2019 12:07 PMContact reviewer
73780Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
The worst judge I have encountered in 35 years of practice. He plays favorites. He is particularly partial to younger, attractive female attorneys as I have seen his wife and she is a beast. Loves handing our sanctions. He is t...Read More08/05/2019 07:54 PMContact reviewer
71685Criminal Defense LawyerNo RatingJudge has a mean and ugly fat slob of a wife. That is his biggest problem which makes him a bad judge of character. How can someone judge others when he couldn't choose a good wife. She is a complete unethical piece of shit.06/29/2019 07:03 PMContact reviewer
69973Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Listened to him make bad ruling after bad ruling in recent hearing. Basic concepts were lost. Would 170.6 immediately06/04/2019 06:12 PMContact reviewer
53991Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Never had a trial with this judge, but I have enjoyed appearing before him on several pre-trial motions (I have represented both plaintiffs and defendants in his courtroom). He has a good temperament, lets the parties make their ...Read More02/05/2018 01:32 PMContact reviewer
53612Criminal Defense LawyerNo RatingThis judge is dense. To be frank on the stupid side. Someone needs to do his "mental work" for him. Bottom line, a fake judge.01/18/2018 04:04 PMContact reviewer
52274Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
No, the online scheduling hasn't prevented cancellation and continuances of long set hearings - often by tentative ruling late the afternoon before, and never an effort to solicit a convenient continuation date from counsel first....Read More10/22/2017 03:05 PMContact reviewer
50407Criminal Defense Lawyer
View Details
Not at all thrilled by this one. He's an automatic 170.6 if you end up in the trial pool and your assigned Department sends the case for trial in his department, 170.6 him. Don't even bother otherwise as you'll hate trying this ca...Read More07/02/2017 05:49 PMContact reviewer
48713Criminal Defense LawyerNo RatingHe is a dummie. Don't believe he ever practiced as an attorney and fakes it all. Hope he has a good clerk in the back because this fellow is a moron. 170.6.04/07/2017 08:06 PMContact reviewer
47088Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Do an immediate 170.6. Ex partes and noticed motions are often cancelled or continued short notice with no hearing. You will rarely know why or be able to have input on if they are continued or when they are rescheduled. You will ...Read More01/07/2017 01:02 PMContact reviewer
46384Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
If you end up in his division, 170.6 him. Nuff said.11/19/2016 09:24 PMContact reviewer
44996Criminal Defense Lawyer
View Details
I am not a fan. In pre-trial matters he is OK. But in trial he is awful. Does not understand the rules of evidence at all. For example he continually let in hearsay evidence under objection because he said the evidence was just ...Read More08/26/2016 07:07 PMContact reviewer
37644Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
If he knows he's likely to be appealed, he pays closer attention. If he doesn't think it will go up on appeal, he rules whichever way he wants. Seems to have problems recognizing the finer distinctions in some cases. Missed a hug...Read More09/19/2015 02:58 PMContact reviewer
37295Criminal Defense LawyerNo RatingThe dude is lazy and dumb. Sorry but he is certainly not marvelous.09/01/2015 01:37 AMContact reviewer
36719Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Judge Gastelum is an outstanding jurist. His Court of Appeal days as a research attorney aids him in being an excellent jurist. I have not seen him step beyond the law. Although I did not prevail in his Courtroom, I would welco...Read More08/05/2015 08:42 PMContact reviewer
35898Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Lazy. Rarely changes tentative ruling. Paper this judge.07/01/2015 04:29 AMContact reviewer
30097Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
You have to reserve a hearing date months in advance to get on long motion calendar. The only way around that is to notice an ex parte application to set it sooner. He often cancels ex parte's and in highly contested matters, ei...Read More10/16/2014 10:29 PMContact reviewer
24551Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
A review of this judge's work product from 2013 reveals that he is an extraordinarily industrious and precise legal jurist, while simultaneously writing with a creative flair that is a pleasure to read.12/10/2013 05:06 PMContact reviewer
23265Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Not a scholarly judge, and he plays favorites.09/13/2013 11:09 AMContact reviewer
23063Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
I found Judge Gastelum to be incapable of understanding basic concepts like statutes of limitations and judicial admissions. He seems to be a decent fellow, but he would be more suited to small claims court than the civil unlimite...Read More08/28/2013 01:55 AMContact reviewer
16497Civil Litigation - PrivateNo RatingPainfully slow to rule on submitted matters....07/31/2012 12:25 PMContact reviewer
16218Civil Litigation - Private
View Details
Well prepared, seems to read everything and has an agreeable demeanor. Issues detailed and thoughtful tentative rulings on l/m but will still hear you out.07/11/2012 01:01 PMContact reviewer

© Copyright The Robing Room All Rights Reserved