Hon. Richard E. L. StraussJudgeSuperior CourtSan Diego
1.8
| Comment # | Occupation | Rating | Comments | Date & Time | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79872 | Civil Litigation - Private | View Details | Disgusting excuse of a judge . Retire old man . You’re useless . You might as well draw a happy face on your pleadings because the lazy idiot doesn’t read anything anyway. How does such an embarrassment become a judge ?!? | 12/07/2019 02:08 AM | Contact reviewer |
| 73608 | Criminal Defense Lawyer | View Details | I don't know what happened to the vast number of negative reviews about Strauss! Does he get them removed?? Strauss is about the worst judge you can imagine. Barely has any brain cells rattling around anymore. He picks a side arb...Read More | 08/02/2019 04:34 PM | Contact reviewer |
| 65348 | Other | No Rating | We did not receive any papers to go to court missed the day of trial lost over $5,000 on a case. Don't go to this judge. | 02/16/2019 02:18 PM | Contact reviewer |
| 61187 | Civil Litigation - Private | View Details | Judge Strauss handled a trial I was involved in over many months. He was always on time, attentive to the evidence and understood complex legal theory. He was patient with the evidence and did not favor one side or the other. H...Read More | 11/01/2018 01:09 PM | Contact reviewer |
| 49432 | Other | No Rating | This judge is very prejudicial he will not help anybody would not even bother reading the pleadings. | 05/11/2017 10:59 PM | Contact reviewer |
| 46213 | Civil Litigation - Govt. | View Details | Yes, this is an example of someone who is long in the tooth and needs to be set to pasture. Seems like he's daydreaming throughout the process and thinks the rules of evidence don't apply in his courtroom. Let's in everything li...Read More | 11/07/2016 02:18 AM | Contact reviewer |
| 44796 | Litigant | No Rating | This judge was going through reading his computer screen and you could see the reaction to whatever his was reading during the questioning of a witness, He ignored facts and seemed to have been predisposed. | 08/16/2016 08:32 PM | Contact reviewer |
| 19161 | Civil Litigation - Private | View Details | Avoid him. His rulings sometimes make no sense. And if you disagree with him (in order to somehow make a record for the appeal) he gets a bit nasty. He needs to retire. | 12/19/2012 06:32 PM | Contact reviewer |
© Copyright The Robing Room All Rights Reserved