The Robing Room

Hon. Patricia M. LucasJudgeSuperior CourtSanta Clara

1.0

Comment #	Occupation	Rating	Comments	Date & Time	Actions
68290	Litigant	No Rating	she not read the case, she accepted fake evidence from another party, she ignored all my requests and not estimated evidence, she denied my request for continuance, because police asked to stop hearing	04/24/2019 06:13 PM	Contact reviewer
58316	Civil Litigation - Private	View Details	Case was removed to another county for inability to get a fair trial in Santa Clara County. Lucas and the criminal court clerks ignored the removal and cotinued to prosecute the case in the complete absence of jurisdiction. Now at...Read More	07/31/2018 08:05 AM	Contact reviewer
58203	Litigant	No Rating	Evidence proved that Vanessa Zecher had violated CRPC by aiding opposing counsel to obtain an order injurious to her own client and Zecher emailed that the judges were 'ill-tempered, ill-prepared or just plain ill" to frighten her...Read More	07/28/2018 01:16 AM	Contact reviewer
56698	Court Staff	No Rating	Even though I work at the courthouse, I condemn Judge Lucas's illegal actions against civilian protesters. She should be recalled and removed off the bench for being biased and blatantly violating people's First Amendment rights.	06/07/2018 03:48 PM	Contact reviewer
52950	Criminal Defense Lawyer	No Rating	Judge Lucas has no respect and bias towards self representing litigants, she would rather you hire an attorney she has control over rather than for someone to question the status quo and rather than having to actually do some thin...Read More	12/04/2017 01:56 PM	Contact reviewer
29423	Litigant	No Rating	Giving bad impression about judiciary. Not at all impartial. Biased against individual versus corporate/banks. Strong animosity against pro se litigant who out performs lawyers. Not well verse in law and does not seek to apply law...Read More	09/13/2014 12:45 AM	Contact reviewer
25375	Civil Litigation - Private	View Details	She behaves like a queen in the courtroom. Do we Americans want to go back to old English law?	02/25/2014 12:43 PM	Contact reviewer
25362	Civil Litigation - Private	No Rating	I received food stamps. I did put the check mark to indicate that she received food stamps. I also stated under oath that she received food stamps. I requested to waive both court fees and additional court fees. However, my additi...Read More	02/24/2014 09:42 PM	Contact reviewer
20904	Litigant	No Rating	I completely agreed. She is always biasd against pro se litigants. She acts like a queen in the court. She doesn;t care about the laws and justice. she is the worest!	04/04/2013 07:21 PM	Contact reviewer
17638	Litigant	No Rating	totally bias against pro pers....her ruling was overturned by the court of appeal. She was ordered to hear the case on the merits....Lucas then abused her discretion as a judge by refusing to rule on the clear evidence presented.	09/22/2012 08:50 AM	Contact reviewer
10713	Criminal Defense Lawyer	View Details	She was terrible as a family court judge, feel sorry for anyone having to appear before her in a criminal proceeding	05/11/2011 03:25 AM	Contact reviewer