The Robing Room

Hon. Michael AntoniewiczSuperior Court JudgeSuperior CourtBergen

2.0

Comment #	Occupation	Rating	Comments	Date & Time	Actions
135038	Other	View Details	During my observation of this proceeding, I was deeply concerned by the presiding judge's conduct. The plaintiff presented photographic evidence depicting significant bruising to the neck and face, along with additional evidence o...Read More	01/29/2026 08:25 PM	Contact reviewer
126117	Litigant	No Rating	There are so many previous cases but only focused on ones that were regarding the judgement on the discretion of the court and not factual evidence provided. Good luck to those that have him as the Judge residing on their case tha...Read More	04/02/2024 07:02 PM	Contact reviewer
126116	Litigant	No Rating	Did not look through evidence provided and based all decisions on discretion of the court. Must have had a bad morning or didn’t want to be bothered looking through the evidence provided in the motion. He only allowed request of ...Read More	04/02/2024 06:52 PM	Contact reviewer
126032	Other	No Rating	Did not allow oral argument or consider any evidence that was provided. Awarded all judgements in defendant's favor who was incompliant to requested documents, proofs, and has not complied with previous court orders. His decisions...Read More	03/28/2024 01:59 PM	Contact reviewer
126031	Other	No Rating	Did not allow oral argument or consider any evidence that was provided. Awarded all judgements in defendant's favor who was incompliant to requested documents, proofs, and has not complied with previous court orders. His decisions...Read More	03/28/2024 01:59 PM	Contact reviewer
126030	Other	No Rating	Did not even look at evidence provided or allow any explanation. Totally dismissed all previous court orders and based judgements with no proofs, evidence, or arguments. Defendant also did not comply with documents requested yet r...Read More	03/28/2024 01:48 PM	Contact reviewer
120893	Litigant	No Rating	Completely ignored large swaths of evidence and arguments and seemed to draw his own conclusions without considering case law or previous court orders, including one from the appelate court.	10/05/2023 12:34 PM	Contact reviewer
120603	Litigant	No Rating	Agree with above posters. He doesn’t know the law on RO and he misses important evidence. Idiot imho.	09/17/2023 06:00 AM	Contact reviewer
120415	Litigant	No Rating	Judge doesn’t seem to consider important evidence. Opinions don’t match the evidence presented in trial. Don’t seem to have a grasp on NJ restraining order laws.	09/06/2023 07:15 PM	Contact reviewer
104396	Criminal Defense Lawyer	View Details	Judge has been assigned to RO cases. He doesn’t know the law and doesn’t seem to care all that much that he doesn’t. I will say he has gotten a little better in the past year or so. He’s even-tempered which is a plus but that’s no...Read More	04/23/2022 08:34 PM	Contact reviewer